<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Ream of Paper, a Photograph, a Child and a Tanned Snake Skin</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ballpythonbreeder.com/2009/12/a-ream-of-paper-a-photograph-a-child-and-a-tanned-snake-skin/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ballpythonbreeder.com/2009/12/a-ream-of-paper-a-photograph-a-child-and-a-tanned-snake-skin/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=a-ream-of-paper-a-photograph-a-child-and-a-tanned-snake-skin</link>
	<description>Ball Python Breeder - Designer Morphs &#38; Investment Quality Reptiles for Sale</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 23:44:39 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Brian Adams</title>
		<link>http://ballpythonbreeder.com/2009/12/a-ream-of-paper-a-photograph-a-child-and-a-tanned-snake-skin/comment-page-1/#comment-293</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Adams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jul 2010 17:59:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ballpythonbreeder.com/?p=1616#comment-293</guid>
		<description>All great points to be brought up, but these regulations, even if &quot;beaten&quot; in legislation will never see an end, more attempts to ban these animals will only be broguht up in the future with just words re-written to accomplish the same thing. Its going to be &quot;us&quot; the industry as a whole that needs to self regulate and apply our &quot;un-official&quot; rules and stick to them that will eventually get legislation off of our backs. I personally do not keep large constrictors although I have in the past. However I do feel with my experience I should be able to keep these animals if I feel I want to. But us as sellers, both retail and wholesale we need to set up guidlines we all follow, even if it is just a pre-qualified &quot;exam&quot; we give to would be customers to guage their knowledge and experience on potentially dangerous animals and &quot;us&quot; as a group deny anyone that we  feel unfit, the purchase of said animal from our inventory. The downside is, there is always going to be a few bad apples that will sell these animals to just anyone with a pulse and a dollar, those are the people the legislation is trying to control and I think we should be the ones controlling those bad apples....... In wrapping this up, If we control ourselves, whats left for legislation?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All great points to be brought up, but these regulations, even if &#8220;beaten&#8221; in legislation will never see an end, more attempts to ban these animals will only be broguht up in the future with just words re-written to accomplish the same thing. Its going to be &#8220;us&#8221; the industry as a whole that needs to self regulate and apply our &#8220;un-official&#8221; rules and stick to them that will eventually get legislation off of our backs. I personally do not keep large constrictors although I have in the past. However I do feel with my experience I should be able to keep these animals if I feel I want to. But us as sellers, both retail and wholesale we need to set up guidlines we all follow, even if it is just a pre-qualified &#8220;exam&#8221; we give to would be customers to guage their knowledge and experience on potentially dangerous animals and &#8220;us&#8221; as a group deny anyone that we  feel unfit, the purchase of said animal from our inventory. The downside is, there is always going to be a few bad apples that will sell these animals to just anyone with a pulse and a dollar, those are the people the legislation is trying to control and I think we should be the ones controlling those bad apples&#8230;&#8230;. In wrapping this up, If we control ourselves, whats left for legislation?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rebecca</title>
		<link>http://ballpythonbreeder.com/2009/12/a-ream-of-paper-a-photograph-a-child-and-a-tanned-snake-skin/comment-page-1/#comment-170</link>
		<dc:creator>Rebecca</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Jan 2010 21:31:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ballpythonbreeder.com/?p=1616#comment-170</guid>
		<description>Very well said Colin.  

I&#039;m so glad that you wrote what you did about the unfortunate incident with the little girl and the Burmese python.  It&#039;s surprisingly hard for many of us to write clearly about just how suspicious that incident was.  Aside from the elements that you mentioned, the description of the boyfriend&#039;s reaction to &quot;finding the snake around the little girl&quot; is particularly shocking to me; does no other parent find the concept of stabbing a snake that is &quot;wrapped around a child&quot; an awfully dangerous thing to do?  As a mother, the VERY first thing on my mind is that the girl will get hit with the knife.  As an experienced reptile keeper (never having stabbed a snake, let alone one that is wrapped around its prey), I can only think that attacking a snake that is &quot;wrapped around a child&quot; would cause the snake to wrap itself tighter.  I think the whole incident stinks on ice, and I wish we could have some kind of a voice in the matter.  NONE of it makes any sense.  As things stand, we were tried &amp; convicted by the headline the moment it hit the web.

Your point about the thoroughly distilled bedtime story is also extremely well illustrated and applied.  I have to say though, Maleficent would be a much better adversary; evil and mighty, but once beaten, she gives a gratifying scream and goes away, leaving behind a smear of tattered rags.  Our opponents don&#039;t have the grace or honor to leave the fight once they have lost... or HR669 would have been the end of this, which we can be assured it is not!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very well said Colin.  </p>
<p>I&#8217;m so glad that you wrote what you did about the unfortunate incident with the little girl and the Burmese python.  It&#8217;s surprisingly hard for many of us to write clearly about just how suspicious that incident was.  Aside from the elements that you mentioned, the description of the boyfriend&#8217;s reaction to &#8220;finding the snake around the little girl&#8221; is particularly shocking to me; does no other parent find the concept of stabbing a snake that is &#8220;wrapped around a child&#8221; an awfully dangerous thing to do?  As a mother, the VERY first thing on my mind is that the girl will get hit with the knife.  As an experienced reptile keeper (never having stabbed a snake, let alone one that is wrapped around its prey), I can only think that attacking a snake that is &#8220;wrapped around a child&#8221; would cause the snake to wrap itself tighter.  I think the whole incident stinks on ice, and I wish we could have some kind of a voice in the matter.  NONE of it makes any sense.  As things stand, we were tried &amp; convicted by the headline the moment it hit the web.</p>
<p>Your point about the thoroughly distilled bedtime story is also extremely well illustrated and applied.  I have to say though, Maleficent would be a much better adversary; evil and mighty, but once beaten, she gives a gratifying scream and goes away, leaving behind a smear of tattered rags.  Our opponents don&#8217;t have the grace or honor to leave the fight once they have lost&#8230; or HR669 would have been the end of this, which we can be assured it is not!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

